Island News & Views
Go to Site Index See "Island News & Views" main page
General · 28th November 2009
Dwayne Rourke
The supposedly scientific findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) are often cited to support statements about global warming. However, this week's dramatic public release of thousands of emails written by members of this panel and its support network, clearly cast doubt on the truthfulness of any of their findings.

The emails have been widely authenticated and in their entirety, reveal monumental fraud at the heart of the IPCC and the network of policy implementers they feed.

Coverage of the fraud has been thin in mainstream media but not on the Internet where it has been a viral phenomenon now commonly referred to as Climategate in reference to the chain of events that brought about the impeachment of US President Richard Nixon.

For your convenience, I share the following text and video links to some of what I have found to be the most objective coverage of this issue:

George Monbiot: Pretending the climate email leak isn't a crisis won't make it go away

James Delingpole: Climategate: the scandal spreads, the plot thickens, the shame deepens…

Video : Climategate: Dr. Tim Ball on the hacked CRU emails

Video: Glenn Beck on "ClimateGate" Man-Made Global Warming Climate Scam-Actual Proven Conspiracy 11-23-09

Video: James Corbett - A message to the environmental movement
"Playing with the only planet we have..."
Comment by Robyn Budd on 1st December 2009
You might want to check out this blog (and the book):
http://www.desmogblog.com/slamming-the-climate-skeptic-scam
Response to Mark
Comment by Dwayne Rourke on 1st December 2009
I believe you will find that the following document by Christopher Monckton will answer your questions Mark:

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/climategate.html
"monumental fraud"
Comment by Mark Lenahan on 30th November 2009
Could you please tell me who committed this "fraud", what papers are fraudulent, and how they are demonstrated to be so.
Please be very specific.
Thanks