Island News & Views
Go to Site Index See "Island News & Views" main page
General · 19th October 2007
Brent Townsend
Hey everybody,
Want to know how to earn a living and sound cool, intriguing and provocative at the same time? It's easy, just make something up. Here's an example: Let's discuss the latest evil environmental government plot: 'Chem Trails'.
Man that's gotta get your attention. There's a gentleman on the net warning us to stand guard against it. Well, read on...

The problem is, to the best of my knowledge, there isn't a thread of evidence that can back him up. So, if you care to indulge me, I offer the following: First of all, the term: 'Chem Trails' is remarkably new. So new in fact, I've never heard of it before. (Remember what I said about making a name for yourself just by making something real scary up?)

I've been studying atmospheric sciences most of my life and I can talk for hours about various questionable techniques such as cloud seeding and other weather modification procedures. I can even describe numerous deliberate and successful attempts at 'atmospheric bombing' with radioactive fall- out conducted by numerous countries interested in testing nuclear devices in the high arctic. But 'chem trails'? Let me give you some practical advice: 'Don't believe the hype'.

I mean, if it's strictly aircraft emissions we're talking about, you can find an immense amount of information on 'condensation trails' (or con-trails, as they are commonly called). And it's worth noting that these trails are more prevalent with the onset of various weather systems. That's why they're not always around. In fact, con-trails are a fairly reliable storm warning. So, when you consider that all sorts of chemicals are emitted by planes, ships and of course cars, then you can easily grasp that all we're really discussing here, is the more inclusive and common problem known as 'exhaust' due to the combustion engine. But this guy doesn't want to tell you that, because it's nothing new, and you can't point your finger at parliament. Whereas 'chem trails' is clearly more sinister sounding and without a doubt - a crock of... well this time I'll coin the new terminology: bio exhaust.

So there you go: the reason we see more con-trails in our skies, is that we also seeing more air travelers. That's not so hard to grasp really. The more cars, planes, and motor boats, the more emissions. That doesn't necessarily make the government corrupt. Personally I think it is more likely the case that mankind is unwittingly corrupting our own atmosphere through otherwise normal activities.

Something to think about.

Sincerely

Agent Orange

contrail confusion
Comment by earthling on 27th October 2007
dude,
Check your head....and the facts.
For one, contrails only form in specific atmopsheric conditions and are/should be rarely seen.
Two, some "guy" on the web?....which one
of the thousands of profesional scientists, geologists ect?

I don't think so,

Earthling
says who
Comment by tinfoil hat guy on 24th October 2007
So question # 1 is ..... Who is this "agentorange "person ? ..... Possibly a goverment spin doctor ? hmmmmmm .... Just google chem trails and a mountain of hits come up . Good old wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory ) states that there has been articals written about the possibility that there is something going on since the 40's regarding said theory, but more recently it came to attention in the early 90's. Good ole Art Bell.... Personally i have heard about this for yrs . Soooo the question i asked at the beginning of my comment stands ... who is the agent orange chap, and where has he been for all theses yrs .

Like "he" said dont believe everything you read ..pro or con. We all know for a certainty that the goverment would NEVER EVER do anything covert or that would harm us , ......would they?.. welllll ....would they?
Have a great day,unless you have other plans.


Perry Noid..aka
"guy with tinfoil hat on when he hears jets"